ETF TER Fee Cuts in 2025: Winners and Losers List
The backstory of these fee cuts is in my Amundi Prime price-war analysis.
ETF TER Fee Cuts in 2025: Winners and Losers List

ETF fee cuts visualization with European market analysis and cost reduction trends
The Fee War Intensifies
European investors now enjoy unprecedented competition among ETF providers. Vanguard led the charge in July 2025 with its largest-ever fee reduction. The firm cut costs across seven fixed income ETFs. Consequently, investors save roughly $3.5 million annually. This aggressive move triggered swift responses from competitors. In short, it created a cascade effect across the industry.
By contrast, State Street fired back with equally bold reductions. The provider slashed the SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF fee from 0.09% to just 0.03%. This shift made it Europe’s cheapest physically replicating S&P 500 ETF. Notably, the move represented a 66.7% fee reduction. It also established new price leadership in the critical S&P 500 segment.
Clear Winners in the Fee Battle
Vanguard: Fixed Income Champion
Vanguard emerged as the undisputed winner in bond ETF fee reductions. The Philadelphia-based giant cut fees across seven fixed income ETFs. In total, these changes spanned 26 share classes. Key reductions include:
| ETF | Previous TER | New TER | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.10% | 0.08% | 20% savings |
| USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF | 0.07% | 0.05% | 28.6% savings |
| EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.09% | 0.07% | 22.2% savings |
These cuts gave Vanguard the lowest-cost fixed income ETF range on average in Europe. Crucially, this reinforces the firm’s commitment to making bonds accessible to retail investors.
State Street: Price Leadership Strategy
State Street showed aggressive price leadership with the most dramatic individual fee cuts. Their SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF reduction to 0.03% hits the lowest possible sustainable fee level according to industry analysts. Analysts called the move “bold”. After all, 3 basis points sits near the operational cost floor for ETF management.
In addition, the provider slashed fees on the SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF from 0.40% to 0.12%. Therefore, this massive 70% reduction makes it the second-cheapest global equity ETF behind Amundi’s offering.
Schwab: Comprehensive Equity Coverage
Schwab’s strategic approach pushed all equity and fixed income ETFs below 10 basis points. Their June 2025 cuts hit four major funds:
| Fund | Previous Fee | New Fee | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 0.05% | 0.03% | 40% savings |
| Schwab International Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.03% | 50% savings |
| Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 0.11% | 0.08% | 27.3% savings |
This comprehensive approach keeps Schwab competitive across all major equity segments.

Visual comparison of ETF providers showing winners and losers in fee competition
Strategic Followers and Mixed Results
UBS: Strategic Fee Matching
UBS adopted a fee-matching strategy. The bank reduced its Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF from 0.09% to 0.03% to directly compete with State Street’s offering. In practice, this shows how smaller providers stay competitive through strategic pricing rather than innovation.
iShares: Selective Approach
BlackRock’s iShares took a more selective approach. The firm focused on specific segments rather than broad cuts. Notably, the biggest reductions targeted ESG funds. For example, the MSCI EAFE ESG Optimized ETF fee dropped from 0.40% to 0.20%. That move marks a dramatic 50% reduction.
However, iShares held higher fees on core products. Their Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF still charges 0.07% while competitors moved to 0.03%. This strategy signals confidence in their brand premium and distribution network.
The Losers: Who Fell Behind?
Traditional High-Fee Providers
Several established providers failed to respond adequately to the fee pressure:
Invesco kept relatively high fees on core products. Their S&P 500 UCITS ETF sits at 0.05%. That remains competitive but not price-leading. Moreover, their MSCI Europe UCITS ETF charges 0.19% compared to cheaper alternatives.
HSBC kept their MSCI World UCITS ETF at 0.15%. This makes it more expensive than Vanguard’s equivalent offerings. Although the fee is still reasonable, it lacks the aggressive pricing needed to attract cost-conscious investors.
Specialty Providers Under Pressure
Niche and specialty ETF providers face the greatest pressure as core product fees approach zero. Active management and alternative strategy providers must justify higher fees through performance and unique exposures. In short, they can no longer compete on cost alone.
Impact on European Investors
The fee cuts deliver substantial long-term savings for European investors. For example, consider a €100,000 investment in an S&P 500 ETF:
- Previous cost (0.09%): €90 annually
- New cost (0.03%): €30 annually
- Annual savings: €60
Over 20 years with compound growth, this fee difference could deliver thousands of euros in additional returns.
The Freedom24 Advantage
European investors who want access to these low-cost ETFs should consider Freedom24 as their trading platform. This regulated broker offers:
- Access to 3,600+ ETFs from major European and global providers
- Competitive trading fees starting from €0.02 per unit
- No minimum deposit requirements for most accounts
- Multi-market access including US, European, and Asian exchanges
Crucially, Freedom24’s regulated status under European MiFID II compliance protects investors. Meanwhile, it gives them access to the full range of low-cost ETFs from winning providers like Vanguard, State Street, and Schwab.
Market Outlook and Future Trends
The fee war shows no signs of slowing. Industry experts expect continued pressure on TERs as providers fight for market share. Additionally, economies of scale increasingly favor larger providers who can absorb lower margins.
Key trends emerging:
- Zero-fee core products becoming standard
- Premium pricing for specialized strategies
- Consolidation pressure on smaller providers
- Focus shifting to service quality and innovation
The European ETF market continues to mature. Total assets now exceed €1.8 trillion and grow rapidly. Consequently, this scale enables further fee reductions as operational costs spread across larger asset bases.
Investment Strategy Recommendations
European investors should:
- Review existing holdings for fee optimization opportunities
- Consider switching to lower-cost alternatives from winning providers
- Prioritize broad market exposure in core holdings where fees matter most
- Use platforms like Freedom24 that provide access to the full competitive landscape
- Monitor ongoing developments as the fee war continues
The 2025 fee cuts mark a watershed moment for European ETF investing. Winners like Vanguard, State Street, and Schwab have set new competitive benchmarks. Therefore, investors benefit through lower costs and higher long-term returns. In practice, smart investors will capitalize on these developments by optimizing their portfolios with the lowest-cost, highest-quality ETFs now available.
Sources and further reading
- justETF — European UCITS ETF screener
- Morningstar UK ETF rankings
- ESMA — European Securities and Markets Authority
- Bogleheads wiki — EU investing
- ETF.com industry data
Before you open any account
grab the free 12-page Starter Kit: the 7-filter fund shortcut, the 3-question broker safety matrix, and the 7 mistakes that cost beginners the most.