ETF TER Fee Cuts in 2025: Winners and Losers List

The backstory of these fee cuts is in my Amundi Prime price-war analysis.

ETF TER Fee Cuts in 2025: Winners and Losers List

The European ETF landscape saw dramatic fee cuts throughout 2025. Major providers slashed costs to attract investors and defend their positions. This analysis reveals the winners. Moreover, it shows which providers fell behind in the intensifying fee war.

ETF fee cuts visualization with European market analysis

ETF fee cuts visualization with European market analysis and cost reduction trends

The Fee War Intensifies

European investors now enjoy unprecedented competition among ETF providers. Vanguard led the charge in July 2025 with its largest-ever fee reduction. The firm cut costs across seven fixed income ETFs. Consequently, investors save roughly $3.5 million annually. This aggressive move triggered swift responses from competitors. In short, it created a cascade effect across the industry.

By contrast, State Street fired back with equally bold reductions. The provider slashed the SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF fee from 0.09% to just 0.03%. This shift made it Europe’s cheapest physically replicating S&P 500 ETF. Notably, the move represented a 66.7% fee reduction. It also established new price leadership in the critical S&P 500 segment.

Clear Winners in the Fee Battle

Vanguard: Fixed Income Champion

Vanguard emerged as the undisputed winner in bond ETF fee reductions. The Philadelphia-based giant cut fees across seven fixed income ETFs. In total, these changes spanned 26 share classes. Key reductions include:

ETF Previous TER New TER Reduction
Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 0.10% 0.08% 20% savings
USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF 0.07% 0.05% 28.6% savings
EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 0.09% 0.07% 22.2% savings

These cuts gave Vanguard the lowest-cost fixed income ETF range on average in Europe. Crucially, this reinforces the firm’s commitment to making bonds accessible to retail investors.

State Street: Price Leadership Strategy

State Street showed aggressive price leadership with the most dramatic individual fee cuts. Their SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF reduction to 0.03% hits the lowest possible sustainable fee level according to industry analysts. Analysts called the move “bold”. After all, 3 basis points sits near the operational cost floor for ETF management.

In addition, the provider slashed fees on the SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF from 0.40% to 0.12%. Therefore, this massive 70% reduction makes it the second-cheapest global equity ETF behind Amundi’s offering.

Schwab: Comprehensive Equity Coverage

Schwab’s strategic approach pushed all equity and fixed income ETFs below 10 basis points. Their June 2025 cuts hit four major funds:

Fund Previous Fee New Fee Reduction
Schwab 1000 Index ETF 0.05% 0.03% 40% savings
Schwab International Equity ETF 0.06% 0.03% 50% savings
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF 0.11% 0.08% 27.3% savings

This comprehensive approach keeps Schwab competitive across all major equity segments.

Visual comparison of ETF

Visual comparison of ETF providers showing winners and losers in fee competition

Strategic Followers and Mixed Results

UBS: Strategic Fee Matching

UBS adopted a fee-matching strategy. The bank reduced its Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF from 0.09% to 0.03% to directly compete with State Street’s offering. In practice, this shows how smaller providers stay competitive through strategic pricing rather than innovation.

iShares: Selective Approach

BlackRock’s iShares took a more selective approach. The firm focused on specific segments rather than broad cuts. Notably, the biggest reductions targeted ESG funds. For example, the MSCI EAFE ESG Optimized ETF fee dropped from 0.40% to 0.20%. That move marks a dramatic 50% reduction.

However, iShares held higher fees on core products. Their Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF still charges 0.07% while competitors moved to 0.03%. This strategy signals confidence in their brand premium and distribution network.

The Losers: Who Fell Behind?

Traditional High-Fee Providers

Several established providers failed to respond adequately to the fee pressure:

Invesco kept relatively high fees on core products. Their S&P 500 UCITS ETF sits at 0.05%. That remains competitive but not price-leading. Moreover, their MSCI Europe UCITS ETF charges 0.19% compared to cheaper alternatives.

HSBC kept their MSCI World UCITS ETF at 0.15%. This makes it more expensive than Vanguard’s equivalent offerings. Although the fee is still reasonable, it lacks the aggressive pricing needed to attract cost-conscious investors.

Specialty Providers Under Pressure

Niche and specialty ETF providers face the greatest pressure as core product fees approach zero. Active management and alternative strategy providers must justify higher fees through performance and unique exposures. In short, they can no longer compete on cost alone.

Impact on European Investors

The fee cuts deliver substantial long-term savings for European investors. For example, consider a €100,000 investment in an S&P 500 ETF:

  • Previous cost (0.09%): €90 annually
  • New cost (0.03%): €30 annually
  • Annual savings: €60

Over 20 years with compound growth, this fee difference could deliver thousands of euros in additional returns.

The Freedom24 Advantage

European investors who want access to these low-cost ETFs should consider Freedom24 as their trading platform. This regulated broker offers:

  • Access to 3,600+ ETFs from major European and global providers
  • Competitive trading fees starting from €0.02 per unit
  • No minimum deposit requirements for most accounts
  • Multi-market access including US, European, and Asian exchanges

Crucially, Freedom24’s regulated status under European MiFID II compliance protects investors. Meanwhile, it gives them access to the full range of low-cost ETFs from winning providers like Vanguard, State Street, and Schwab.

Market Outlook and Future Trends

The fee war shows no signs of slowing. Industry experts expect continued pressure on TERs as providers fight for market share. Additionally, economies of scale increasingly favor larger providers who can absorb lower margins.

Key trends emerging:

  • Zero-fee core products becoming standard
  • Premium pricing for specialized strategies
  • Consolidation pressure on smaller providers
  • Focus shifting to service quality and innovation

The European ETF market continues to mature. Total assets now exceed €1.8 trillion and grow rapidly. Consequently, this scale enables further fee reductions as operational costs spread across larger asset bases.

Investment Strategy Recommendations

European investors should:

  1. Review existing holdings for fee optimization opportunities
  2. Consider switching to lower-cost alternatives from winning providers
  3. Prioritize broad market exposure in core holdings where fees matter most
  4. Use platforms like Freedom24 that provide access to the full competitive landscape
  5. Monitor ongoing developments as the fee war continues

The 2025 fee cuts mark a watershed moment for European ETF investing. Winners like Vanguard, State Street, and Schwab have set new competitive benchmarks. Therefore, investors benefit through lower costs and higher long-term returns. In practice, smart investors will capitalize on these developments by optimizing their portfolios with the lowest-cost, highest-quality ETFs now available.

Sources and further reading

Free 12-page guide — instant delivery

Before you open any account

grab the free 12-page Starter Kit: the 7-filter fund shortcut, the 3-question broker safety matrix, and the 7 mistakes that cost beginners the most.



Affiliate disclosure: some links in this article are affiliate links to brokers I have a relationship with. If you open an account through one, I may earn a commission — at no cost to you — and it never affects my assessment. See my full Affiliate Disclosure for how I keep editorial decisions independent.
Kestutis Balciunas, founder of Financial Expert Class
Kestutis Balciunas
European UCITS/ETF investor with 11+ years building a global dividend and index portfolio, and founder of Financial Expert Class. I write every guide here from first-hand experience investing across EU brokers and tax regimes — not theory.
Risk disclaimer: Investing always involves the risk of losing your capital. Past performance and predictions do not guarantee future results. Do your own research and consider consulting a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.